JISC
At its 19th meeting the JISC:
(a) Recognised the JIAG as communication channels
between the JISC and project participants;
(b) Invited the JIAG each to send a representative
to each meeting of the JISC;
(c) Invite written inputs from the JIAG and PD
Forum to be submitted by 14 days prior to each JISC meeting.
The JIAG invites JI project participants to provide input by e-mail to the JIAG
Secretariat. All submissions
will be communicated to the JISC, including input that departs from a consolidated
view of the JIAG. In these cases the JIAG may indicate that there is no
agreement amongst JIAG members on the matter. The JIAG Memorandum further details
on the JIAG procedures and communication with the JISC.
Input
for the Extraordinary JISC meeting can be sent to Jelmer Hoogzaad.
Previous submissions from the JIAG to the JI Supervisory Committee can be downloaded below. Other publications from the JIAG can be found under 'Publications' and presentations can be found under 'Events'.
| Document |
Topics covered |
Submitted for: |
Date of submission |
| Letter to JISC Meeting 22 |
Applicability of JI Guidelines to Projects under Determination, Materiality, Changes in project implementation |
JISC 22 |
7 June 2010 |
| JIAG Input on experience with the verification procedure under the JISC |
Input on experience with the verification procedure under the JISC: including some high importance areas in the JI procedures and documents that are the source of frequent debates between project participants and
AIEs; and some minor fixes that can significantly speed-up the process of project development, determination and verification. |
Call for public inputs on experience with the verification procedure under the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee (JISC) and the JI Roundtable. |
| Position Paper on the Future of JI |
Alligning Track 1 and Track 2, Issuance of ERU, Domestic and Unilateral JI, Governance of JI, Establishment of Multisectoral Baselines, Accreditation Procedures, Crediting Periods beyond 2012, Providing certainty beyond 2012. |
| JI Analysis |
An analysis of t ime lags and bottlenecks of selected JI Projects. |
| Legal Opinion on JI Projects from Kazakhstan and Belarus (Cover Letter) |
|
Reaction to request from JISC at its 20th meeting. |
| Letter to JISC Meeting 21 |
Applicability of changes in JI Guidelines and Rules to Projects under Determination |
JISC 21 |
8 April 2010 |
| Reaction to Cal for Input on Materiality and Changes during Project Implementation |
JIAG suggestions on Materiality under JI and how to accommdate Changes in the Project Design after Determination has been made Final. |
JISC Call for Input on Materiality and Changes
during Project Implementation |
26 March 2010 |
| Letter on Accreditation and Witnessing |
Suggestions from the JIAG for Improvement of the Procedures for Accreditation of Independent Entities. |
Call for public inputs on the Joint implementation accreditation standard - first draft |
12 March 2010 |
| Letter to JISC Meeting 20 |
Outcome Copenhagen, Work Plan for the JISC in 2010, JIProjects in Belarus and Kazakhstan. |
JISC 20 |
9 February 2010 |
| Response to DVM v2 |
Specific Suggestions for the Draft Version 2 ofthe Determination and Verification Manual. |
Call for public input on determination and verification manual (DVM) - second draft |
16 October 2009 |
| Response to PoA procedures |
Specific Suggestions for the Draft Procedures for JI Programme of Activities. |
Call for public input on procedures for joint implementation programmes of activities (JI PoA) under the verification procedure under the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee |
28 September 2009 |
| Policy Paper for Copenhagen |
The Essence of JI; the different Tracks, Governance and Role of the JISC; Additionality; Conversion and Transfer of ERUs; JISC Members. |
COP/MOP Copenhagen |
7 September 2009 |
| Letter to JISC Meeting 17 |
Proposal from the JIAG to revise Version 2 of the “Provisions for the charging of fees to cover administrative costs relating to the activities of the joint implementation supervisory committee” |
JISC 17 |
5 September 2009 |