Joint Implementation
Joint Implementation (JI) is one of the three flexible mechanisms
for emissions trading set out in the
Kyoto Protocol. Like the
Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) , it is a mechanism for financing
individual projects aimed at reducing GHG emissions. JI credits are
created by reducing actual emissions in a project compared to a
hypothetical baseline in the future, similar to the way the CDM
operates. However, JI is different. It is only for
Annex I countries with capped
GHG emissions, unlike CDM which is solely in non-Annex I
countries with no GHG reduction obligations. This is crucial because
JI credits are not offsets, but emission reductions effectively
indistinguishable from allowances under a cap-and-trade system.
Under JI, the total mandatory emission reductions are unchanged;
project-based reductions are simply shifted and credited toward
another country.
Why is it important?
JI will likely become the central project-based flexibility
mechanism in future cap-and-trade schemes. More countries and
sectors are expected to commit to GHG reductions, and the role of JI
will be key in allowing countries to trade credits and create
projects among themselves. Over time, it is likely that the role of
CDM will diminish as JI moves into a more central role. This opens
up the possibility for JI to create cost-efficient emission
reductions in sectors and regions not covered by domestic emissions
trading. It can also serve as a carbon price "safety-valve" by
allowing the inflow of cheaper credits into the cap-and-trade
scheme.
Other benefits include:
- Promotes innovation. Project-based mechanisms encourage innovation
to reduce emissions: new, innovative methodologies can be developed
and tested in a private and voluntary environment.
- Unrestricted in scope. JI is a valuable tool to explore the
potential of areas not generally targeted by emission trading
schemes. Whereas a trading scheme is by definition limited in scope,
a JI-like mechanism is not.
- Emphasises positive incentives rather than penalties. Trading
schemes and standard-setting tend to be based on penalties in order
to make non-compliance less rewarding. This creates a natural
resistance and slows down implementation as traditional,
conservative, industrial companies grapple with the new operating
environment. In contrast, project-based mechanisms are a source of
new funding attractive to businesses and entrepreneurs.